"OVERTHRUST" - An Unworkable Speculation

When the Scottish Lawyer Charles Lyell came up with the Geologic Column, the modern dating methods were not in use.
But the Geoligic Column became evolutionary dogma. Evolutionists move mountains to defend it.

The problem is not the deposits. The problem is Lyell's hypothesis. Mountains testify that Lyell's Geologic Column is WRONG.

Chief Mountain (left) is a small portion of the Lewis "Overthrust." Here, as in many places in the world, the uninterrupted sedimentary layers wildly contradict Lyell's hypothesis.

Hubbert and Rubey in "Role of Fluid Pressure in Mechanics of Overthrust Faulting" (1959) made a noble attempt at finding a way to mathematically defend the idea, but they could not.

There is no force that can move a mountain. If there were, it would break up the mountain. There are no scratch marks, mylonite, slickensides, or piles of gravel.

It LOOKS like the sediments were deposited WHERE they were deposited in the ORDER they were deposited because they WERE deposited WHERE they were deposited in the ORDER they were deposited.

Apes with Human Feet and Straight Backs

Does it make you wonder? Evolutionists don't seem to complain about these fraudulent artistic renderings.

I guess a little fraud is OK if it brings people to the politically correct evolutionist viewpoint.

Lucy was an Australopithicine ape. Her posture was more crouched like a chimp, not erect as depicted in some evolutionist illustrations. Her feet were not human feet, as misrepresented in the artist renderings. Her fingers were curved like a chimp. Her toes were MORE curved than a chimp. She had ape-like shoulder blades. Long arms. Was probably a tree dweller and knuckle walker. Had an ape-like semicircular canal that makes habitual bipedal locomotion doutful. William Howells of Harvard said, "...the pelvis was by no means modern ... the heel bones lacked our stabilizing tubercules."

"...morphology on a recently discovered specimen of Australopithecus afarensis closely matches that of gorillas...cast doubt on the role of Australopithecus afarensis as a modern human ancestor." - Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, edited by David Pilbeam, Harvard, April 10, 2007

"Natural Selection" is a Hoax

That which is Nothing At All is credited with making Absolutely Everything.

Frequently Natural Selection is called a PROCESS. OK, WHAT is the PROCESS?
They don't say. They can't. Natural Selection is WHATEVER must have happened to cause WHATEVER happened.

Darwin never said what Natural Selection WAS. He only made claims about what the figment of his imagination DID.

Natural Selection is NO REAL THING.
Natural Selection is a WORD TRICK.
Natural Selection is UNDEFINED.
Natural Selection is TWO WORDS.

Darwin said it acts. It has power. It's a mechanism.

But he didn't say (and nobody has a clue) what it IS!

Universal Probability Bound: 10¹⁵⁰

Molecular Structure	Combinatorial Complexity
ATP Synthase	20⁴⁹⁰⁰
Ribosome	20^20,000
Human DNA	4^{3,000,000,000}

Each of these structures has a combinatorial complexity that dwarfs the Universal Probability Bound. What this means is that if all the atoms in the universe could self-assemble into proteins and DNA (they can't), producing any of these indispenable components of life is mathematically impossible.

How big is 10¹⁵⁰?
    10⁸⁰   Number of atoms in the Universe
  X 10¹⁸   Number of seconds in 31 billion years
  X 10⁴⁵   Number of things an Electron does in 1 second
  X 10⁷    Fudge Factor in case we weren't generous enough

Consider 10⁴⁵. How can an electron can do this many thngs in a second? An electron travels the distance of its own diameter (which isn't much) in 10^-26 seconds. How can it do 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 more things than that?

Lets Give Those Poor Chimps Their Chromosomes Back

Imagine two automobiles have a head-on collision. They pry the two vehicles apart and, to their surprise, they discover that the collision produced a laptop computer! You don't make a computer by smashing two machines together. And you don't produce an important, uniquely human gene by smashing two chimp chromosomes together.

Ken Miller is again very entertaining in his typical Vaudeville style. We wouldn't take that away from him. But when it comes to Chromosome 2, he's just dead wrong.

Here's a little fun history.
What were eventually named Chimp chromosomes 2A and 2B in the past were labelled chromosomes 12 and 13. When it was thought that these two chromosomes had merged into human chromosome 2, they hastily renamed chromosomes 12 and 13 as 2A and 2B. Oops! I wonder, will they change them back to 12 and 13 now?

So You Need More Evidence?

Would the Riboosome with its 20,000 amino acids be evidence enough? How about the interdependence of Ribosomes and ATP Synthase? You can't have either without BOTH of them already in existence. How about the vast amounts of prescriptive information in DNA? Or the molecular machines that can copy the code in DNA, edit it, spellcheck it, and translate it, would that be enough? How about the fact that you can have neither Ribosomes nor ATP Synthase without DNA to define them. Or the fact that the machines that replicate DNA cannot exist without Ribosomes and ATP Synthase already functioning.

Consider Mitosis.
A team of molecular machines working cooperatively are needed to divide a cell in two so that both daughter cells retain all the parts and functions of the original cell.

Topoisomerase - The Amazing Detangler

What series of evolutionary accidents could the most imaginative evolutionist come up with that would explain the existence of this machine? It detects a need to untangle DNA. It knows WHERE to cut. It knows HOW to cut. It is able to keep the two loose ends so they don't get away from each other. It knows how to detangle the DNA. And it knows how to mend the two ends back together.

Do you have FAITH that some authoritative evolutionist has an explanation for how Topoisomerase could evolve?

Keep having FAITH!

It takes a lot of FAITH to believe that something so intelligently designed could happen by accident. Evolutionists put their FAITH in Natural Selection, an imaginary mechanism. They put their FAITH in imaginary authorities. They have FAITH that someone somewhere has an explanation for how multitudes of exquisitely designed creations could come into existence by a long sequence of fortuitous accidents.

Believing that an Intelligent Designer designed a multitude of intelligently designed designs requires far less faith. And it is far more reasonable.

Evolution can explain how molecular factories got built? That's BALONEY!

Accidents made WALKING ROBOTS. Accidents made BIDIRECTIONAL PUMPS. Accidents made billions of bits of INFORMATION in DNA. Accidents made molecular machines that could COPY, EDIT, SPLICE, SPELLCHECK, and TRANSLATE the information in DNA. Accidents made COMMUNICATION NETWORKS. Accidents made DATA STORAGE and RETRIEVAL mechanisms. Accidents made SPINNING TURBINES.

YEAH RIGHT!

Humans build pumps; produce billions of bits of information; make machines and software that copy, edit, spellcheck, and translate information; make communication networks; and build data storage and retrieval systems. The miniature systems inside the cell are MORE sophisticated than the ones made by man. The machines made by man's intelligent design DIDN'T and COULDN'T happen by accident. But the more sopisticated molecular machines inside the cell DID happen by accident?

YEAH RIGHT!

The explanatory power of evolution really bombs!

Natural Selection Is Nothing REAL

What an odd thing that those who believe in Materialism also believe in Natural Selection! Natural Selection is NOT A MATERIAL THING.

Natural Selection is a figment of Darwin's imagination. Darwin made many claims about what it DID, but never defined what it WAS. He couldn't. It is NO REAL THING.

Natural Selection is colorless. It has no length, breadth, or width. You can't weigh it. You can't see, hear, smell, feel, or taste it. That which is NOTHING AT ALL is credited with making ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING. Materialists who believe in Natural Selection are people of GREAT FAITH. They believe in something they have never seen. MATERIALISTS believe in that which is IMAGINARY!

Natural Selection is deliciously VAGUE. Is it the selector? Is it the selectee? Is it both? Or is it sometimes one thing and other times another? And those who fancy themselves as the most sciectific believe the most in Natural Selection!

The so called MECHANISM of evolution is nothing but Darwin's WORD TRICK!

Mitochondria: Super Complex, Ingeniously Engineered

Consider the whole package. The TWO MEMBRANES make the space in between small enough for the protons inside to be under pressure.

The series of PUMPS forces the protons from an area of LOW pressure to an area of HIGH pressure.

An amazing SIGNALLING SYSTEM called Electronic Transport exists. Tiny molecular machines transport a SINGLE ELECTRON from one pump to another!

Protons under pressure turn the ATP Synthase TURBINE which turns the shaft which operates the six lobes that synthesize ATP.

Not one of these interdependent machines could happen by accident, let alone the whole system. This can only be the product of intelligent engineering.

The whole system has to be in place at the same time working together before ANY of it can do anything useful. All of it . . .
    • the Two Membranes,
    • the Pumps,
    • the Electron Transport signalling system,
    • the ATP Sythase Turbine
. . . all of it had it be in existence functioning together before ANY of it was useful for anything.

Send in the Whale Stories

Regarding whale evolution, Ken Miller, the Vaudeville Evolutionist, with his usual flair, claimed
researchers have found "not ONE, not TWO, but THREE intermediates". Let's take them in order.

Not 1: Pakicetus was a 20-pound running land animal. So we're off to a running start.

Not 2: Ambulocetus Natans had a pointed tail, not good for flukes. Its eyes weren't in the right spot for a whale.

Not 3: Basilosaurus lived at the same time as the baleen whales they supposedly preceded. Barbara J. Stahl, author
of Vertebrate History: Problems in Evolution, said, "The serpentine form of the body and the peculiar serrated cheek
teeth made it plain that these archaeocetes could not possibly have been ancestral to any of the modern whales."

Like the Ring Master in Sondheim's "Send in the Clowns", Ken has an impeccable sense of timing.

He's sure of his lines. He just doesn't know fact from farce.

Publish or Perish

The Journal of Molecular Evolution has never explained how dead molecules ever turned into something living.

The only Molecular Evolution is in the title of the journal.

But at least they don't espouse the nonsense that Abiogenesis is not Evolution.

"More than 30 years of experimentation on the origin of life in the fields of chemical and molecular evolution have led to a better perception of the immensity of the problem of the origin of life on Earth rather than to its solution. At present all discussions on principle theories and experiments in the field either end in stalemate or in a confession of ignorance."
- Dr. Kaus Dose, "The Origin of Life: More Questions Than Answers", Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol 13, No. 4, 1988, p 348

Hard Core Evolutionists Laugh at Irreducible Complexity

Kenneth Miller has shown that the Bacteria Flagellum is NOT irreducibly complex. If you remove 90% of the parts, you are left with a perfectly functional HOLE in the side of the bacterium.

How silly of us not to think of that?

We thought the purpose of a PROPULSION system had something to do with PROPULSION.

Some Creationists are so deluded they think Inboard Outboard Motors are DESIGNED. No, no. Pistons are perfectly functional as paper weights. Combustion engines are perfectly functional as door stops. As long as any part can be used for anything else it must NOT have been designed.

Who can disagree with that?

What a One-Two Punch!

The two biggest enemies of evolution are MATH and CHEMISTRY.

By the way, the phrase "if the left hand don't gitcha" is just rhetorical. Math gets evolution every time. There is not enough matter and time is the universe to allow evolution a chance to make any living thing.

So the right hand (CHEMISTRY) isn't even needed. But don't worry. It can clobber evolution all by itself.

Let me explain.

The Pentose molecule is indispensible for life. You can't have DNA or RNA without it. Pentose molecules don't self-generate on underwater thermal vents, or in mud puddles, or in dark caves, or on freezing and thawing lake shores, or on clay slabs, or in pools that evaporate and refill. Nor can Pentose be made by the best chemists in the world working in the the best laboratories. That's just the beginning. There are a thousand enzymes that chemical accidents and chemists can't make either.

One Molecular Machine Performing an Amazing Function

Come on! How could such an amazing invention happen by accident? It knows WHERE it is supposed to do its job. Thank goodness! You wouldn't want it cutting out the GOOD letters! Then it knows HOW to do its job. How did a mindless molecular robot learn to do that?

If you intuitively think that this machine was DESIGNED by an Intelligent Designer,
your intuition is not the problem.

Don't let the evolutionists insult, badger, or belittle you into abandoning your intuition.
Don't let them manipulate you into buying into their unworkable theory.

But if you are more of a LOGIC person than an INTUITION person, the logic is found in the MATH. MATH tells us that all the resources in the universe together cannot produce enough accidents to make a molecular machine like this in 15 billion years.

Junk DNA - We Don't Use That Term Any More

Think about Francis Collins's comment about regulation.
What this means is that much of the DNA code REGULATES how other code operates.
How could such regulating code exist without being designed by an Intelligent Designer?
Regarding repeats we already know that a LACK of repeats causes diseases.
Don't be too quick to assume that repeats or Alus are junk either.

"In fact, only one genetic factor generally scaled with complexity. The only genomic features that increased in number as animals became more complicated were the regions of junk DNA. The more sophisticated an organism, the higher the percentage of junk DNA it contains."

How do you like that?

The more "JUNK DNA" you have, the more COMPLICATED and SOPHISTICATED you are.

Evolutionists Enjoyed Thinking That Most DNA Was Junk

Scientists discovered that DNA defines proteins. But only a small portion of the DNA defines proteins. Most DNA does NOT code for proteins. Evolutionists then made a BIG MISTAKE. They referred to the small amount of DNA that coded for PROTEINS as "CODING" DNA (as if DNA could code for nothing else). Then the majority of DNA they labeled "NON-CODING" DNA or JUNK DNA. As it turns out, the "NON-CODING" code codes for more things than the "CODING" code codes for.

Why were evolutionists eager to jump to such a bad conclusion?

Because if most DNA was useless junk, it would better fit their evolutionary presumptions.

What was formerly called Junk DNA does important things:
    • Prevents mutations
    • Controls Telemere length
    • Activates X chromosomes in females
    • Makes RNAs that regulate Hox genes
    • Regulates brain development
    • Directs protein activity
    • Helps build ribosomes
    • Makes tRNA
    • Develops fingers and face
    • Affects eyes and skin
    • Changes the shape of molecules

Fake Science and Fake News Are Roommates

The truth that evolution is chemically and mathematically implausible is censored in public schools.
The main stream news media with their usual fascade of objectivity frequently promote evolution.
Both the Fake News and Fake Science have atheistic leanings.

Natural Selection is a FAKE DESIGNER.
Natural Selection is a FAKE CHOOSER.
The Pilton Skull was a FAKE FOSSIL.
Haekel's illustrations were FAKE DRAWINGS.
Peppered Moths transforming into Peppered Moths is FAKE EVOLUTION.
Pictures of apes standing erect on Human Ankles are FAKE RENDERINGS.
The horse series is a FAKE SEQUENCE.
The News Media's evolutionary propaganda is FAKE NEWS.
The Theory of Evolution is FAKE SCIENCE.
Schooling full of evolutionary indoctrination is FAKE EDUCATION.

The Elephant in the Room - "Orphan" Genes Were Created

Evolutionists made up a clever term to describe unique Genes.
They call them "orphan" genes, because they can't find any other gene similar enough that they could have evolved from. They look like they were CREATED. There are lots of these "orphan" genes. But instead of acknowedging the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM, and recognizing that the best explanation for their exist is Creation, they imagine that these poor unique genes have a long, lost evolutionary parent somewhere.

Let's Make Two Things Perfectly Clear

1. Evolution cannot do it. The intricacies and interrelations of the eye's many amazing components are exactly what evolutionary accidents cannot produce.
2. God CAN do it. The crystal clear cornea, the ring of muscles that control the lens, and the amazing Retinal Pigment Epithelium are a few of the "contrivances" that require an Intelligent Engineer to create.

The dovetail edges and ball-and-socket surfaces of the clear, parallel cellular fibres of the lens are a stunning example of intelligent design.

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1568/1250

Evolution Is As Certain as Gravity - Oh Really?

Gravity can can be empirically tested and observed. Evolution - not so much.

Evolutionists have wished so strongly for evolution to be considered a fact.
They have said it is as certain as Earth's orbit around the sun.

Since Darwin's time, scientists discovered that our cells are filled with armies of MOLECULAR MACHINES.

Cells contain vast amounts of prescriptive INFORMATION and the machinery to interpret it.

Many individual proteins are so complex that their evolution would be MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

It is CHEMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for DNA, RNA, and Enzymes to evolve.

The claim that evolution is a FACT is not made quite so loudly now.

Some Evolutionists Claim That DNA Is Not Information

Code that contains computer-like syntax and code that gets copied and interpreted is the kind of information generated by human minds. When we find code in DNA that is copied and interpreted by molecular machines, we can reason that the source of that information is likewise a brillant Mind. But human Software Engineers have not yet written code capable of directing robots to copy the computer hardware, copy the operating system software, copy all application software, and copy all the robots involved in the copying. The DNA code found inside the living cell IS able to do all these things. An intelligent Mind is a better explanation for the origination of this information than a series of countless evolutionary accidents.

No Human-written code is as COMPACT and POWERFUL as DNA

Some people are amazed at how LONG DNA is.

Others of us are amazed at how SHORT and COMPACT it is FOR WHAT IT DOES.

A cell is as complex as a city. And it is full of moving robots. Imagine if there were programmers that were smart enough to build a city with CODE. And that city was then able to reproduce itself and all the robots. We would say those programmers were geniuses.

The DNA code inside a cell defines all the molecular machines, roadways, manufacturing facilities, power plants, intelligent doorways, communication networks, transporters, code editors, and repair systems inside the cell.

DNA code is COMPACT for what it does.

The Coder was a Super Genius Coder.

Cycle-Free Krebs Cycle

Kreb's Cycle is amazing for its efficiency. Evolutionists are perplexed how such an irreducibly complex system with its enzymes could come into existence. Then, Eureka, they figured it out! There must have been an ENZYME-FREE Kreb's Cycle.

Then they dicovered it!

But they also discovered something disconcerting about their new-found chemical cycle. Not only was this cycle an enzyme-free cycle, but this cycle was also a CYCLE-FREE cycle. Kinda like a round tire that's square on one side. Or maybe a round tire that doesn't go all the way around!

Coding Code vs Non-coding Code

Evolutionists, in their presumptuous rush to trash DNA, claimed that most DNA was JUNK. Only a small portion of DNA codes for proteins. This portion the evolutionists labeled "coding DNA", as if the remainder of code coded for nothing, but were only a massive collection of evolutionary accidents. Vestiges of evolution. JUNK. Then someone actually researched the "junk". They found out that it is full of highly sophicated REGULATORY code.

But please note, you would not want to live without your "junk" DNA anymore than you would want to live without your "vestigial" coccyx.

Engineers Are Needed in Order to "Evolve" Chevrolets

Two cars that are different from each other in multiple ways each need an ENGINEER to design them.

Living species that are different from each other morphologically (different in shape) in multiple ways and different from each other genetically in multiple ways each need an ENGINEER to design them.

Just like cars.

There is a difference, though, between what God makes and what human engineers make. God, being the superior Programmer that He is, writes code that is robust. This means He makes speciecs that are programmed to adjust within limits when faced with special hardships.

Cars can't do that.

Chaperones Are Amazing Creations!

Amino acid chains produced by Ribosomes cannot always self-fold to become a functional protein.
They need little helpers, tiny machines called Chaperones, to pull the protein into shape.
Imagine the forethought needed to design and make such amazing molecular machines!
Forethought is what evolution does not have.

Evolution has a lot of STORIES but not much SCIENCE

The DNA code for Cetaceans would have to change at an alarming RATE
to account for the making of a Blue Whale.

Biology is not just Chemistry. Biology is Information Technology!

Shown below is a molecular doorway imbedded in the surface of a cell's nucleus.

This mechanical device is infused with analytical powers. It inspects molecules
on the outside of the nucleus and "decides" which ones may enter.

It is an "Intelligent" doorway.

This amazing creation is full of INTENT and INTELLIGENCE.

No sequence of lucky accidents could produce this technology.

Explaining the existence of such a device requires a Paradigm Shift in thinking. Science must move AWAY from Evolution and TO the explanatory power of Intelligent Design.

Evolution Lacks Insight, Forethought, and Intent

The kind of understanding needed to detect a spelling error, snip out the bad component, insert the correct one, and heal the breach, is exactly what a mindless, undirected series of accidents cannot achieve.

Tag Teams of Molecular Robots

Modern factories use robots to manufacture products like cars. But man-made robotic systems have not achieved the level of sophistication found inside the cell.

We KNOW the originators of factory robots were intelligent minds.

Would it not be reasonable to think that the originator of molecular robots was also a mind?

Bad Thinking Is Accepting the Impossible and Rejecting the Reasonable

Wouldn't you consider astronomical odds against evolution to be sufficient reason for discrediting it?

How about one chance in the number of atoms in the universe?

Wouldn't that qualify as astronomical?

The problem is that the odds for evolution are no where near that good.

Bad Thinking is believing in evolution against such odds.
Good Thinking is believing that things that LOOK design probably WERE designed.

Chicken-And-Egg Problems

ATP Synthase cannot exist without Ribosomes to make it.

Ribosomes cannot operate without ATP batteries to power them.

Neither ATP Synthase nor Ribosomes can exist without DNA to define them.

DNA cannot be replicated without the molecular machines produced by Ribosomes.

There are many more CHICKEN-AND-EGG problems than these.

Design by a wise Creator is a much better explanation for multi-layered interdependent complexities than a multitude of fortuitous evolutionary accidents.

70% of the members of National Academy of Sciences are atheists

Since evolution of life is statistically impossible, they imagine an infinite number of universes.

They don't believe in God because they can't SEE God.

Instead they believe in a multitude of universes because... Oops! They can't see them either!

If you think that teams of molecular machines working together in a high-speed choreography is better explained by an Intelligent Creator, don't doubt yourself.

Your thinking is better than the elites at NAS.

Evolutionists who still use the "vestigial organ" excuse are behind the times

These "vestigial" features are things you would not want to live without.

Without your Coccyx you would have trouble standing and sitting.

If you are an athlete, you better keep your Double Curved Spine.

If you tried rewiring your eyeballs you would be blind or vision impaired. And don't trade your eyes with an octopus. You could see things just fine if they are within 5 feet, but only if they move.

If you redirect the path of your Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve, you just may be messing with your heart, your ability to swallow, and other things that are better left undisturbed.

Evolutionists have no plausible explanation for the enzymes that make AMP

You must have AMP before you can have ADP.

You must have ADP before you can have ATP,
the molecular battery that your body cannot live without.

The dark red pictures to the left represent enzymes. The yellow and orange pictures represent intermedite molecules on the way to becoming AMP.

These intermediates have no other use. So how could evolution "select for" them?

AMP presents a multi-layered problem for evolution. To prepare a system of machines and events like this requires planning and Intelligent Design.

It LOOKS designed because it WAS designed.

Evolutionist don't even attempt a good GUESS on how the cell evolved

Have you read Evolution Xpert's Everything Simultaneous Hypothesis?

Many wild guesses for the origin of the cell have been suggested.
Here are a few : Membrane First, Metabolism First, RNA World.

They are all contradicted by science and are mutually exclusive of each other.

The one hypothesis that is consistent with life everywhere we see it in all of its forms is the Everything Simultaneous Hypothesis.

Logically, life cannot exist without the essential components existing and interoperating simultaneously.

The Everything Simultaneous Hypothesis is confirmed both by LOGIC and OBSERVATION.

The other hypotheses are denied both by LOGIC and OBSERVATION.

Atheism is unscientific. It is supported by nothing. It explains nothing.

The foundation for Atheism is Evolution, and Evolution is scientifically implausible.
The supposed engine behind Evolution is Natural Selection, and Natural Selection is no real thing.
Darwin made many claims about what Natural Selection DID but never bothered to define what it IS.
He couldn't. It is nothing real.

Self-Replicating Peptide

It has been reported that a self-replcating peptide has been developed.
The implication evolutionists portray is that the evolution of life is therefore possible.
Here are some notes about David Lee's 32 amino acid self-replicating peptide.
    •  It is tiny compared to a typical enzyme.
    •  It is only ONE peptide. Hundreds are needed for life.
    •  It was derived from yeast, not from prebiotic conditions.
    •  It required human intelligent design.
    •  It necessarily results in a dead end.
       You cannot get to DNA this way.